• Blog
  • Board index
  • FAQ
  • Register
  • Login
Board indexGamingRules Queries
  • Search
  • Print view

Yet another Camo vs ARO question

Got a question about the rules? Present the Data Sphere community with your inquiry!
Post a reply
11 posts • Page 1 of 1

Yet another Camo vs ARO question

by Bramowy » January 29th, 2016, 7:59 am

Hi !

First time poster and new player here.
I'm playing Nomads with particular taste for CAMO and TO units. During my couple of first games I have encountered a list containing MSV3 unit, namely an Aquila Guard. During the gameplay a situation occured:

0-------->X---------->
_______ ______
| | | |
|_______| | ______|

A N
0 - Zero
A - Aquila Guard
N - Nisse

During my active turn Zero under camo marker activates, uses first part of the order to move into the open, then uses the other one to move behind next cover (or, at least, that's the plan). My opponent declares discovery ARO on Aquila after the first half move. Now he states that since Aquila automatically passes his Discovery roll (which I do not object, just cry about it ) his Nisse gets to declare to shoot. Obviously I do not agree. My reasoning is that all ARO happen at the same time, so Nisse can only declare Discovery, dodge or delayed aro. He does not get to shoot, since at the moment od declaring ARO my Zero is still a marker. Even if he delays ARO i do not commit any aggresive action, just keep moving, so his delayed ARO is forfeit. My Zero is discovered, but finishes his order safely behind the other box.
Please, help out a newbie and tell me who's right on this one. If I have not explained the situation clear enough please let me know.

EDIT: Can't get the picture to show properly (works fine with preview)
Last edited by Bramowy on January 29th, 2016, 8:33 am, edited 3 times in total.
Bramowy
 
Posts: 3
Joined: January 29th, 2016, 6:59 am
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Yet another Camo vs ARO question

by Darek_CTR » January 29th, 2016, 8:24 am

In my opinion you are right.
https://www.facebook.com/infinitychelmza/
User avatar
Darek_CTR
 
Posts: 698
Joined: May 10th, 2015, 8:43 pm
Has liked: 221 times
Been liked: 153 times

Re: Yet another Camo vs ARO question

by Errhile » January 29th, 2016, 9:16 am

Yep, you are right.


Camo Marker (Zero) declares his 1st Short Skill: Move.

Nisse and Aquila declare their AROs. In the given example, Aquilla declares a Discover ARO, while the Nisse declares Shoot ARO.

Camo Marker (Zero) declares his 2nd Short Skill. Now, let's take 2 options into consideration - Move (2a) and Shoot (2b).

2a, Zero Moves again. Order resolution phase - Aquila automatically succeeds in Discover Roll (damn those MSV L3's). However, this happens at the same moment as the Zero is moving forward, and he reaches his intended destination uninterrupted, if out of Camo.
Nisse keeps his finger on the trigger, but untill the Order gets resolved, he does not see the Zero (he sees a Camo Marker) so he can not shoot.

2b, Zero Shoots. Order resolution phase - Aquila's Discover ARO is wasted, for his target has dropped out of Camo (due to Attack Skill).
If Zero decides to shoot at the Aquila, it will be a Normal roll (with Nisse shooting at Zero with Normal roll too, as his MSV L2 allows him to ignore the -3 modfier for Zero's Camo).
If Zero decides to shoot at the Nisse, it will be a Face-to-Face roll (for Nisse will be shooting back). Nisse's MSV L2 still allows him to ignore the -3 modifer caused by Camouflage, but he will be still affected by another -3 modfier due to Surprise Shot by a Marker.
If Zero decides to divide his Burst, his shots at the Aquila will be Normal Rolls, while shots at the Nisse will be Face-to-Face rolls with -3 Suprise Shot modifer affecting the Nisse.
They say there will be Heaven and the Fount of Kausar,
That there, there will be pure wine and honey and sugar
Fill up the wine cup and place it in my hand
(For) ready cash is better than a thousand credits.


- Rubayyat of Omar Khayyam, but it is a shoddy translation :(
User avatar
Errhile
 
Posts: 3750
Joined: July 14th, 2014, 4:42 pm
Location: Szczecin, Poland
Has liked: 1820 times
Been liked: 413 times

Re: Yet another Camo vs ARO question

by H1ghlander » January 29th, 2016, 7:11 pm

2a, Zero Moves again. Order resolution phase - Aquila automatically succeeds in Discover Roll (damn those MSV L3's). However, this happens at the same moment as the Zero is moving forward, and he reaches his intended destination uninterrupted, if out of Camo.
Nisse keeps his finger on the trigger, but untill the Order gets resolved, he does not see the Zero (he sees a Camo Marker) so he can not shoot.


I disagree, for this reason. "The cancellation of the Camo State is applied to the whole declared Order" (pg 71 core rulebook). This would allow the delayed Shoot ARO to be resolved, as the Zero would have finished it's order not in the camo state, and travelled through LOF to the Nisse during said order.
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit - Clan Motto
Looking for mdf buildings and terrain? Check out Northern Lights Terrain
User avatar
H1ghlander
 
Posts: 176
Joined: October 28th, 2014, 12:42 am
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 40 times

Re: Yet another Camo vs ARO question

by Dylan Gould » January 29th, 2016, 8:05 pm

H1ghlander wrote:I disagree, for this reason. "The cancellation of the Camo State is applied to the whole declared Order" (pg 71 core rulebook). This would allow the delayed Shoot ARO to be resolved, as the Zero would have finished it's order not in the camo state, and travelled through LOF to the Nisse during said order.

The section you are referencing, if you read the start of it, refers to actions the camo marker takes that cancel the marker state...an enemy Discover is not in the list.

Additionally, from the preceeding page (emphasis mine):
However, if you choose to delay your ARO, you may only declare it if the Camouflage Marker revealed itself with its second Short Skill. If the Marker does not reveal itself, the reactive trooper loses his right to ARO.
Dylan Gould
 
Posts: 26
Joined: December 3rd, 2014, 6:08 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 4 times

Re: Yet another Camo vs ARO question

by WookieeGunner » January 29th, 2016, 9:02 pm

You are correct. From the Discover wiki entry:

In his Active Turn, an enemy Camouflage Marker declares a Short Movement Skill within LoF of Fusiliers Angus and Bipandra.The only AROs available to the Fusiliers are Dodge (to try to relocate slightly) and Discover (to reveal the Marker and be able to shoot at it in subsequent Orders). What they very specifically cannot do is have Angus declare Discover and Bipandra declare BS Attack. Remember that all AROs are simultaneous, and a Marker must be revealed before it can be the target of a BS Attack.


The fact that the Aquilla Guard auto-passes his Discover check doesn't negate the fact that he has to declare it. So the example you are giving is identical to Angus passing a Discover and Bipandra shooting which the above quote negates.
WookieeGunner
 
Posts: 104
Joined: March 12th, 2013, 12:17 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 12 times

Re: Yet another Camo vs ARO question

by H1ghlander » January 29th, 2016, 11:18 pm

Dylan Gould wrote:
H1ghlander wrote:I disagree, for this reason. "The cancellation of the Camo State is applied to the whole declared Order" (pg 71 core rulebook). This would allow the delayed Shoot ARO to be resolved, as the Zero would have finished it's order not in the camo state, and travelled through LOF to the Nisse during said order.

The section you are referencing, if you read the start of it, refers to actions the camo marker takes that cancel the marker state...an enemy Discover is not in the list.

Additionally, from the preceeding page (emphasis mine):
However, if you choose to delay your ARO, you may only declare it if the Camouflage Marker revealed itself with its second Short Skill. If the Marker does not reveal itself, the reactive trooper loses his right to ARO.


Regarding the cancellation of the camo state, it is listed under 'Cancellation', and it also lists 'The Camouflaged trooper is successfully discovered' as well - all circumstances of a trooper losing its camo state is listed under that heading, not just the actions the trooper takes.

I had missed the point regarding the camo trooper revealing itself vs being discovered regarding AROs, so thanks for setting me straight on that.
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit - Clan Motto
Looking for mdf buildings and terrain? Check out Northern Lights Terrain
User avatar
H1ghlander
 
Posts: 176
Joined: October 28th, 2014, 12:42 am
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 40 times

Re: Yet another Camo vs ARO question

by Bramowy » January 30th, 2016, 7:31 pm

I admit you lost me there, H1ghlander. Does it mean I was right, or my opponent was ?
Bramowy
 
Posts: 3
Joined: January 29th, 2016, 6:59 am
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Yet another Camo vs ARO question

by Errhile » January 30th, 2016, 8:53 pm

Well, I stand by my opinion: your opponent was wrong.

He was effectively delaying a Shoot ARO. When the target became discovered, it was at the end of the Order, therefore the delayed ARO was wasted.
They say there will be Heaven and the Fount of Kausar,
That there, there will be pure wine and honey and sugar
Fill up the wine cup and place it in my hand
(For) ready cash is better than a thousand credits.


- Rubayyat of Omar Khayyam, but it is a shoddy translation :(
User avatar
Errhile
 
Posts: 3750
Joined: July 14th, 2014, 4:42 pm
Location: Szczecin, Poland
Has liked: 1820 times
Been liked: 413 times

Re: Yet another Camo vs ARO question

by Bramowy » January 30th, 2016, 9:38 pm

Thank you.
Could you please point me to the rule, which says that the resolution of the AROs takes place when my order is finished ? My opponent, who's also my good friend states, that Discovery took place after the first part of the order (move), so when I declare the second part Zero is no longer a marker but a model and can be shot at when it moves. So, according to him, rule that says that I must perform an action that causes me to lose camo no longer applies.
Bramowy
 
Posts: 3
Joined: January 29th, 2016, 6:59 am
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Yet another Camo vs ARO question

by WookieeGunner » January 30th, 2016, 11:10 pm

Step 8 of the Order Expenditure Sequence:

http://wiki.infinitythegame.com/en/Orde ... e_Sequence
WookieeGunner
 
Posts: 104
Joined: March 12th, 2013, 12:17 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 12 times


Post a reply
11 posts • Page 1 of 1

Return to Rules Queries

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Contact Us

contactdatasphere@gmail.com
 

View new posts

  • Re: Wyzwanie malarskie - kwiecień 2026 by Errhile
  • Re: Wyzwanie malarskie - kwiecień 2026 by kashper
  • Re: Wyzwanie malarskie - kwiecień 2026 by Errhile
  • Re: Wyzwianie malarskie - marzec 2026 by kashper
  • Re: Wyzwanie malarskie - kwiecień 2026 by Errhile
  • Re: Wyzwianie malarskie - marzec 2026 by kashper
  • Wyzwanie malarskie - kwiecień 2026 by Errhile
  • Re: Wyzwianie malarskie - marzec 2026 by Errhile
Designed by RocketTheme
Reset
  • Data Sphere
  • Corvus Belli