by ARCangel » March 26th, 2016, 3:40 am
by Claudius Sol » March 26th, 2016, 5:23 am
by Section9 » March 26th, 2016, 8:07 am
by schoon » March 26th, 2016, 9:35 am
by VisOne » March 27th, 2016, 4:30 am
by Section9 » March 27th, 2016, 8:11 am
VisOne wrote:I use anything from any where if the price, look and feel is right. If I can't find it commercial I'll make it myself is a great learning curve no one supplier make's the "right" terrain for this game in either density or aesthetics in my mind. I often cringe at whole tables of the same manufacturer because more often than not it's some deal and its not just a cookie cutter table it's unpainted to boot to me that's a bigger sin.
by MARC C » March 29th, 2016, 7:00 pm
ARCangel wrote:So, recently I read a post where terrain was being discussed and one of the posters mentioned diversity of terrain. He said that you should have around 2-3 different terrain manufacturers' product on your table so it doesn't look samey. Other than tables specifically built under a certain theme, what are your thoughts on this? Do you use diverse terrain? If so, how many different types? What do you use?
by ARCangel » March 30th, 2016, 2:45 am
MARC C wrote:ARCangel wrote:So, recently I read a post where terrain was being discussed and one of the posters mentioned diversity of terrain. He said that you should have around 2-3 different terrain manufacturers' product on your table so it doesn't look samey. Other than tables specifically built under a certain theme, what are your thoughts on this? Do you use diverse terrain? If so, how many different types? What do you use?
There is a risk that things won't align properly if you use different manufacturers. Staircases, catwalks and bridges from one manufacturer may be to high or too low when put next to the other product. Its probably why most people concentrate on one manufacturer.
I'm not that bothered about sameness in Sci-Fi. There are many reasons (themes) why an area would have all the same buildings : Military base, Outpost, Prefab Habitats, Colony, Vacation Resort, etc. Even today when you look at large cities its not hard to find a few blocks of the same buildings built by one contractor.
On the other hand I'm also a big fan of large cities where a variety of styles coexist. My home city of Montreal has building ranging from the 1800s up to today within a few blocks in the central area. The older the city the more chance of it being eclectic architecturally.
It all comes down to personal preference in the end. There is no right or wrong approach really.