by ElectricPaladin » July 15th, 2014, 7:30 pm
by rahxephon » July 16th, 2014, 3:38 am
by Arachas » July 17th, 2014, 9:29 am
by IJW Wartrader » July 17th, 2014, 9:37 am
by Arachas » July 17th, 2014, 10:31 am
IJW Wartrader wrote:HRLs are not parabolic, no speculative shot for you.
by Errhile » July 17th, 2014, 10:37 am
by dlfleetw » July 17th, 2014, 1:42 pm
Arachas wrote:IJW Wartrader wrote:HRLs are not parabolic, no speculative shot for you.
Aiieeee you're right. That sucks!
Intuitive then?
by ElectricPaladin » July 17th, 2014, 10:11 pm
by ElectricPaladin » July 18th, 2014, 3:50 am
by McNamara » July 18th, 2014, 2:17 pm
by ElectricPaladin » July 18th, 2014, 3:30 pm
McNamara wrote:Adding some WB yourself might also help, but the ones CJC gets are pretty expensive.
by Spears » July 18th, 2014, 3:56 pm
by McNamara » July 18th, 2014, 8:10 pm
by ElectricPaladin » July 18th, 2014, 8:18 pm
McNamara wrote:The MB lists aren't bad, but going Alguacils and adding more intruders is even more annoying to Adriana. Attacking camo markers with camo markers is always bad, unless you are an Intruder.
by McNamara » July 18th, 2014, 8:33 pm
by Willowran » July 19th, 2014, 2:34 am
by rahxephon » July 19th, 2014, 9:18 am
by IJW Wartrader » July 19th, 2014, 10:51 am
by Willowran » July 20th, 2014, 4:36 pm
by Hero of Man » July 21st, 2014, 3:29 am
IJW Wartrader wrote:There's a pretty good argument based on http://infinitythegame.wikispot.org/Camouflage_Example that Discover-Shoot still gets Combat Camo.
Anyway, where Intruders excel against camo is if you can get some smoke cover down from McMurrough or Lupe - the Intruders can then Discover through the smoke. This will reveal them from camo but as it's not a BS Attack it doesn't reveal them through the smoke cloud.
by Marsyas » July 21st, 2014, 10:33 pm
by IJW Wartrader » July 22nd, 2014, 2:13 am
by csjarrat » July 23rd, 2014, 5:29 pm
by McNamara » July 23rd, 2014, 9:03 pm