Page 1 of 1

Going to my first ITS tournament, need some feedback

PostPosted: November 4th, 2015, 2:36 pm
by Grauenacht
This weekend, I will be playing my first ever infinity ITS tournament with specialists, we play 3 missions that day. One of my lists I wanted to take something that could just wreck like hell and hopefully kill the specialists from my opponent so they cannot score objective points, this is the list I had in mind for that ( I just had to field a haramaki fire team, because I really like the models):

Keisotsu spec op with: chain of command/ hacker/ doctor 9
Keisotsu 9
Keisotsu ML 1,5 SWC 14
Keisotso paramedic 11pts
Yuriko Oda 23
Yao Zao 3
Haramaki Contender 22
Haramaki Contender 23
Haramaki Contender 23
Haramaki Combi rifle 30
Haramaki ML 1,5 SWC 33

Raiden HRL 1,5 SWC 19
Husong 1 SWC 25
Neko Oyama 34
Yojimbo 21

Total 14 orders, 5,5 SWC 299pts

My second list will take care of missions with objectives

What do you thik about it, I really wish to include the Haramaki link team or Domaru Link because I like the models :P

Keisotsu spec op with: chain of command/ hacker/ doctor 9
Keisotsu HMG 1 SWC 17
Keisotsu FO 10
Keisotso paramedic 11
Yuriko Oda 23
Oniwaban 41
Ninja multisniper 1,5 SWC 42
Ninja hacker 0,5 SWC 40
Ninja hacker 0,5 SWC 40
Shinobu Kitsune 1 SWC 47

Raiden HRL 1,5 SWC 19

Total 11 orders, 6 SWC 300pts

Re: Going to my first ITS tournament, need some feedback

PostPosted: November 4th, 2015, 3:46 pm
by Claudius Sol
Remember that you can't have multiple fireteams. So your first list will need to decide between Haramaki or Keisotsu.

I'd consider dropping Oyama to a regular Domaru. Oyama is nice, but if he's your Lt., you don't want to use him too offensively, even with Chain of Command.

For the second list, I'd be wary of having too many models using Hidden Deployment. You might find yourself low on orders. As well, I'd recommend having the Raiden in the main group, that way you can use his Regular order, if you want to. Perhaps moving one of the Hidden Deployment models to the second group instead will be better.